With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this pass? On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Checked licenses, > RAT, > Build, > Smoke Tested with Spark. > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:05 PM Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache Iceberg >> 1.9.2 release. >> >> The commit id is 071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >> * >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >> >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >> * >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0/ >> >> You can find the KEYS file here: >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >> >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven repository >> URL is: >> * >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1214/ >> >> This change includes a fix to avoid table corruption, by not retrying on >> 502/504, which if retired can cause self conflict, hence causing the client >> to trigger clean up and leaving the table in corrupted state. >> Discuss thread - >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oqonscy1b4qlmovnjtbcohz38kgprgmq >> >> Please download, verify, and test. >> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) >> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.2 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >> >> Best, >> Prashant Singh >> >
