+1 (non-binding) 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries 3. Compiled the source code 4. Verified license files / headers 5. Ran Flink tests
-Max On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:27 PM Yuya Ebihara < yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Confirmed that Trino CI is green. > It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC > (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and > Snowflake. > > Yuya > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 4:42 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Verified signature, checksum, license. >> * Build + test passed using Java 17 >> * Ran a few examples on Spark >> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests >> >> > With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this pass? >> >> Releases (even a patch release like this one) requires 3 binding votes to >> pass. PMC members can cast binding votes so we need 2 more binding votes >> here. >> Here's some more information about the voting process, >> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#introduction and >> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#voting >> >> > I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 >> applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >> >> We're actively working on the next minor release >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/rr1t42fm055vq0cst3v46hoxrszrbrh2>, 1.10 >> which will include that specific commit. Does it make sense to just wait >> for the 1.10 release or would you like to backport the fix to 1.9.x? >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 7:58 AM Claude Warren, Jr >> <claude.war...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: >> >>> I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 >>> applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:57 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>> >>>> I assume that it does not and that another binding +1 is needed. I can >>>> not provide that as I am not PMC. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:51 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>>> >>>>> With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this pass? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM Russell Spitzer < >>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Checked licenses, >>>>>> RAT, >>>>>> Build, >>>>>> Smoke Tested with Spark. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:05 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache >>>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.2 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The commit id is 071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1214/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This change includes a fix to avoid table corruption, by not >>>>>>> retrying on 502/504, which if retired can cause self conflict, hence >>>>>>> causing the client to trigger clean up and leaving the table in >>>>>>> corrupted >>>>>>> state. >>>>>>> Discuss thread - >>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oqonscy1b4qlmovnjtbcohz38kgprgmq >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.2 >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>> >>>>>>
