Adding my +1 (non-binding) as well, Ran the validations using ( https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/?h=verify#how-to-verify-a-release), manual tests
Best, Prashant Singh On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:21 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran checksum and signature. Checked licenses and ran tests. > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op wo 16 jul 2025 om 14:43 schreef Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature >> 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries >> 3. Compiled the source code >> 4. Verified license files / headers >> 5. Ran Flink tests >> >> -Max >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:27 PM Yuya Ebihara < >> yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Confirmed that Trino CI is green. >>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC >>> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and >>> Snowflake. >>> >>> Yuya >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 4:42 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> - Verified signature, checksum, license. >>>> * Build + test passed using Java 17 >>>> * Ran a few examples on Spark >>>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests >>>> >>>> > With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this >>>> pass? >>>> >>>> Releases (even a patch release like this one) requires 3 binding votes >>>> to pass. PMC members can cast binding votes so we need 2 more binding votes >>>> here. >>>> Here's some more information about the voting process, >>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#introduction and >>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#voting >>>> >>>> > I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 >>>> applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >>>> >>>> We're actively working on the next minor release >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/rr1t42fm055vq0cst3v46hoxrszrbrh2>, >>>> 1.10 which will include that specific commit. Does it make sense to just >>>> wait for the 1.10 release or would you like to backport the fix to 1.9.x? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 7:58 AM Claude Warren, Jr >>>> <claude.war...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 >>>>> applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:57 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>>>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I assume that it does not and that another binding +1 is needed. I >>>>>> can not provide that as I am not PMC. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:51 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>>>>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this >>>>>>> pass? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Checked licenses, >>>>>>>> RAT, >>>>>>>> Build, >>>>>>>> Smoke Tested with Spark. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:05 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache >>>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.2 release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The commit id is 071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1214/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This change includes a fix to avoid table corruption, by not >>>>>>>>> retrying on 502/504, which if retired can cause self conflict, hence >>>>>>>>> causing the client to trigger clean up and leaving the table in >>>>>>>>> corrupted >>>>>>>>> state. >>>>>>>>> Discuss thread - >>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oqonscy1b4qlmovnjtbcohz38kgprgmq >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.2 >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
