+1 (non-binding) Confirmed that Trino CI is green. It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and Snowflake.
Yuya On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 4:42 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified signature, checksum, license. > * Build + test passed using Java 17 > * Ran a few examples on Spark > * Ran pyiceberg integration tests > > > With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this pass? > > Releases (even a patch release like this one) requires 3 binding votes to > pass. PMC members can cast binding votes so we need 2 more binding votes > here. > Here's some more information about the voting process, > https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#introduction and > https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#voting > > > I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 > applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. > > We're actively working on the next minor release > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/rr1t42fm055vq0cst3v46hoxrszrbrh2>, 1.10 > which will include that specific commit. Does it make sense to just wait > for the 1.10 release or would you like to backport the fix to 1.9.x? > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 7:58 AM Claude Warren, Jr > <claude.war...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > >> I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 applied >> to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:57 AM Claude Warren, Jr <claude.war...@aiven.io> >> wrote: >> >>> I assume that it does not and that another binding +1 is needed. I can >>> not provide that as I am not PMC. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:51 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>> >>>> With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this pass? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM Russell Spitzer < >>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Checked licenses, >>>>> RAT, >>>>> Build, >>>>> Smoke Tested with Spark. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:05 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache >>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.2 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> The commit id is 071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>> * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>> >>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>> * >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0/ >>>>>> >>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven >>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>> * >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1214/ >>>>>> >>>>>> This change includes a fix to avoid table corruption, by not retrying >>>>>> on 502/504, which if retired can cause self conflict, hence causing the >>>>>> client to trigger clean up and leaving the table in corrupted state. >>>>>> Discuss thread - >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oqonscy1b4qlmovnjtbcohz38kgprgmq >>>>>> >>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.2 >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>> >>>>>
