+1 (binding) Ran checksum and signature. Checked licenses and ran tests.
Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 16 jul 2025 om 14:43 schreef Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>: > +1 (non-binding) > > 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature > 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries > 3. Compiled the source code > 4. Verified license files / headers > 5. Ran Flink tests > > -Max > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:27 PM Yuya Ebihara < > yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Confirmed that Trino CI is green. >> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC >> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and >> Snowflake. >> >> Yuya >> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 4:42 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> - Verified signature, checksum, license. >>> * Build + test passed using Java 17 >>> * Ran a few examples on Spark >>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests >>> >>> > With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this >>> pass? >>> >>> Releases (even a patch release like this one) requires 3 binding votes >>> to pass. PMC members can cast binding votes so we need 2 more binding votes >>> here. >>> Here's some more information about the voting process, >>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#introduction and >>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#voting >>> >>> > I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 >>> applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >>> >>> We're actively working on the next minor release >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/rr1t42fm055vq0cst3v46hoxrszrbrh2>, >>> 1.10 which will include that specific commit. Does it make sense to just >>> wait for the 1.10 release or would you like to backport the fix to 1.9.x? >>> >>> Best, >>> Kevin Liu >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 7:58 AM Claude Warren, Jr >>> <claude.war...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> I would like to see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13345 >>>> applied to the 1.9.2 release as it solves a race condition that we see. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:57 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I assume that it does not and that another binding +1 is needed. I >>>>> can not provide that as I am not PMC. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:51 AM Claude Warren, Jr < >>>>> claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this >>>>>> pass? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Checked licenses, >>>>>>> RAT, >>>>>>> Build, >>>>>>> Smoke Tested with Spark. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:05 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache >>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.2 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The commit id is 071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1214/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This change includes a fix to avoid table corruption, by not >>>>>>>> retrying on 502/504, which if retired can cause self conflict, hence >>>>>>>> causing the client to trigger clean up and leaving the table in >>>>>>>> corrupted >>>>>>>> state. >>>>>>>> Discuss thread - >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oqonscy1b4qlmovnjtbcohz38kgprgmq >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.2 >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
