I assume that it does not and that another binding +1 is needed. I can not provide that as I am not PMC.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 9:51 AM Claude Warren, Jr <claude.war...@aiven.io> wrote: > With only what I assume are 2 +1 (Prashant and Russell) does this pass? > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Checked licenses, >> RAT, >> Build, >> Smoke Tested with Spark. >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:05 PM Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache Iceberg >>> 1.9.2 release. >>> >>> The commit id is 071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0 >>> * >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/071d5606bc6199a0be9b3f274ec7fbf111d88821 >>> >>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>> * >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.2-rc0/ >>> >>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>> >>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged in Nexus. The Maven repository >>> URL is: >>> * >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1214/ >>> >>> This change includes a fix to avoid table corruption, by not retrying on >>> 502/504, which if retired can cause self conflict, hence causing the client >>> to trigger clean up and leaving the table in corrupted state. >>> Discuss thread - >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oqonscy1b4qlmovnjtbcohz38kgprgmq >>> >>> Please download, verify, and test. >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.2 >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant Singh >>> >>
