Hi Eduard, I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024.
However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java library (now). The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 Cheers, Dmitri. On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> wrote: > We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and people asked > to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially still alive. > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution that >> balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward when there >> has been a veto from the community. >> >> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm >> consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we >> should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale for >> his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd have to >> dig up.) >> >> Ryan >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (no-binding) >>> >>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other ways >>> to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best solution >>> available. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>> > +1 (nb) >>> > >>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>> >> -1 (nb) >>> >> >>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>> >> > >>> >> > Cheers, >>> >> > Dmitri. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Hey everyone, >>> >> > >>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a simple >>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace >>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are either >>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will >>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>> >> > >>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST server >>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing >>> >> > installations. >>> >> > >>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in #10877 >>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>> >> > >>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks >>> >> > Eduard >>> >> > >>> >> -- >>> >> Robert Stupp >>> >> @snazy >>> >> >>> >>> -- >>> Xuanwo >>> >>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>> >>
