+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Prashant Singh

On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Eduard,
>>
>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024.
>>
>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording changes in
>> PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java library (now).
>>
>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now.
>>
>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877
>>
>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dmitri.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and people
>>> asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially still alive.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution that
>>>> balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward when there
>>>> has been a veto from the community.
>>>>
>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm
>>>> consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we
>>>> should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale for
>>>> his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd have to
>>>> dig up.)
>>>>
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (no-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other
>>>>> ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best
>>>>> solution available.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote:
>>>>> > +1 (nb)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote:
>>>>> >> -1 (nb)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote:
>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Cheers,
>>>>> >> > Dmitri.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner
>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >     Hey everyone,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >     as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a
>>>>> simple
>>>>> >> >     path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace
>>>>> >> >     separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are
>>>>> either
>>>>> >> >     running into issue #10338
>>>>> >> >     <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will
>>>>> >> >     eventually when they upgrade their server stack.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >     The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST server
>>>>> >> >     implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing
>>>>> >> >     installations.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >     Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in #10877
>>>>> >> >     <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >     The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >     Thanks
>>>>> >> >     Eduard
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Robert Stupp
>>>>> >> @snazy
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Xuanwo
>>>>>
>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to