+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1(binding) >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Prashant Singh >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Eduard, >>>>>> >>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording changes >>>>>> in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java library >>>>>> (now). >>>>>> >>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>>>>> >>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>>>>> >>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Dmitri. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and people >>>>>>> asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially still >>>>>>> alive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution >>>>>>>> that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward >>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>> there has been a veto from the community. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm >>>>>>>> consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we >>>>>>>> should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's >>>>>>>> rationale for >>>>>>>> his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd >>>>>>>> have to >>>>>>>> dig up.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other >>>>>>>>> ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best >>>>>>>>> solution available. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a >>>>>>>>> simple >>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace >>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are >>>>>>>>> either >>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will >>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST >>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing >>>>>>>>> >> > installations. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in >>>>>>>>> #10877 >>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks >>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>>>>>>>> >> @snazy >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Xuanwo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
