+1 (binding) On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1(binding) > Yufei > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Best, >> Prashant Singh >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Eduard, >>>> >>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>>> >>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording changes >>>> in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java library >>>> (now). >>>> >>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>>> >>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>>> >>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Dmitri. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and people >>>>> asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially still >>>>> alive. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution >>>>>> that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward when >>>>>> there has been a veto from the community. >>>>>> >>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm >>>>>> consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we >>>>>> should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale >>>>>> for >>>>>> his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd have >>>>>> to >>>>>> dig up.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Ryan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other >>>>>>> ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best >>>>>>> solution available. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a >>>>>>> simple >>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace >>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are >>>>>>> either >>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will >>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST >>>>>>> server >>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing >>>>>>> >> > installations. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in >>>>>>> #10877 >>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Thanks >>>>>>> >> > Eduard >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>>>>>> >> @snazy >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Xuanwo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>
