Adding my own +1. @Dmitri Yes I've extracted the Spec changes out of the impl PR into https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 to have less code to review.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1(binding) > >>>> Yufei > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Prashant Singh > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording > changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java > library (now). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> Dmitri. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and > people asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially > still alive. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best > solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move > forward when there has been a veto from the community. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to > confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus > we should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale > for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd > have to dig up.) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ryan > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any > other ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best > solution available. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner > >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is > providing a simple > >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the > namespace > >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that > are either > >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 > >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or > will > >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST > server > >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for > existing > >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in > #10877 > >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> -- > >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp > >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >
