+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1(binding) >>>> Yufei >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording changes >>>>>>> in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java library >>>>>>> (now). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Dmitri. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and people >>>>>>>> asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially still >>>>>>>> alive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution >>>>>>>>> that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward >>>>>>>>> when there has been a veto from the community. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm >>>>>>>>> consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we >>>>>>>>> should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's >>>>>>>>> rationale for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different >>>>>>>>> thread that I'd have to dig up.) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other >>>>>>>>>> ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the >>>>>>>>>> best solution available. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a >>>>>>>>>> >> > simple >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are >>>>>>>>>> >> > either >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST >>>>>>>>>> >> > server >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in >>>>>>>>>> >> > #10877 >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/
