+1(binding) Yufei
On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Prashant Singh > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Eduard, >>> >>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>> >>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording changes in >>> PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java library (now). >>> >>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>> >>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>> >>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Dmitri. >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and people >>>> asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially still >>>> alive. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution >>>>> that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward when >>>>> there has been a veto from the community. >>>>> >>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm >>>>> consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we >>>>> should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale >>>>> for >>>>> his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd have >>>>> to >>>>> dig up.) >>>>> >>>>> Ryan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other >>>>>> ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best >>>>>> solution available. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a >>>>>> simple >>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace >>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are >>>>>> either >>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will >>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST server >>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing >>>>>> >> > installations. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in #10877 >>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Thanks >>>>>> >> > Eduard >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>>>>> >> @snazy >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Xuanwo >>>>>> >>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>>>>> >>>>>
