With 16 +1 votes (9 binding) and one invalid veto <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto> vote due to missing justification the vote passes.
Thanks everyone On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 5:27 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2025, 5:17 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 7:26 AM Matt Topol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025, 8:30 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (nb) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 4:51 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > +1 >>>> > >>>> > Kind regards, Fokko >>>> > >>>> > Op do 4 dec 2025 om 08:25 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> [email protected]>: >>>> >> >>>> >> Adding my own +1. >>>> >> >>>> >> @Dmitri Yes I've extracted the Spec changes out of the impl PR into >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 to have less code to >>>> review. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM Steve <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> +1 (binding) >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> +1(binding) >>>> >>> >>>> Yufei >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Best, >>>> >>> >>>>> Prashant Singh >>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>> +1 >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec >>>> wording changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the >>>> java library (now). >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>> >>> >>>>>>> Dmitri. >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync >>>> and people asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially >>>> still alive. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best >>>> solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move >>>> forward when there has been a veto from the community. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended >>>> to confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have >>>> consensus we should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's >>>> rationale for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread >>>> that I'd have to dig up.) >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Ryan >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found >>>> any other ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the >>>> best solution available. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is >>>> providing a simple >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the >>>> namespace >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of >>>> *hardcoded*) that are either >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> >>>> or will >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* >>>> for REST server >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change >>>> for existing >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST >>>> Spec in #10877 >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>>> >>>
