+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 4, 2025, 5:17 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 7:26 AM Matt Topol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025, 8:30 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (nb) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alex >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 4:51 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > Kind regards, Fokko >>> > >>> > Op do 4 dec 2025 om 08:25 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >> >>> >> Adding my own +1. >>> >> >>> >> @Dmitri Yes I've extracted the Spec changes out of the impl PR into >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 to have less code to >>> review. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM Steve <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> +1 (binding) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> +1(binding) >>> >>> >>>> Yufei >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> Best, >>> >>> >>>>> Prashant Singh >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> +1 >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec >>> wording changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the >>> java library (now). >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>>>>>> Dmitri. >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync >>> and people asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially >>> still alive. >>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best >>> solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move >>> forward when there has been a veto from the community. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to >>> confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus >>> we should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale >>> for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd >>> have to dig up.) >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Ryan >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found >>> any other ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the >>> best solution available. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is >>> providing a simple >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the >>> namespace >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) >>> that are either >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> >>> or will >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* >>> for REST server >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change >>> for existing >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST >>> Spec in #10877 >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>> >>
