+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 4, 2025, 8:30 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (nb) > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 4:51 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Kind regards, Fokko > > > > Op do 4 dec 2025 om 08:25 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]>: > >> > >> Adding my own +1. > >> > >> @Dmitri Yes I've extracted the Spec changes out of the impl PR into > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 to have less code to review. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > +1 (non-binding) > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> +1 (binding) > >>> >> > >>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> +1 (binding) > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> +1(binding) > >>> >>>> Yufei > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Best, > >>> >>>>> Prashant Singh > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> +1 > >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording > changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java > library (now). > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>> >>>>>>> Dmitri. > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and > people asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially > still alive. > >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best > solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move > forward when there has been a veto from the community. > >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to > confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus > we should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale > for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd > have to dig up.) > >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> Ryan > >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found > any other ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the > best solution available. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is > providing a simple > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the > namespace > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) > that are either > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> > or will > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for > REST server > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for > existing > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST > Spec in #10877 > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -- > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>> >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >
