Thanks Sharan, I am a CHAOSS co-lead and very much appreciate your initiative.
1. CHAOSS is (slowly) working on a conformance program that would officially allow Kibble to claim conformance with CHAOSS metrics. As we create this program, it would be amazing to have representation from Kibble in the conversation so that we can create the program in a way that will work for Kibble. 2. It would be amazing to know how Kibble implements the CHAOSS metrics <https://chaoss.community/metrics/>. As Sharan said, CHAOSS is open to feedback and changing the metric based on your feedback. Any kind of feedback would be appreciated. After completing (2), it would be awesome to add in each metric a link to Kibble as known implementation. This will allow everyone looking at CHAOSS metrics to learn about Kibble. I’m happy to answer questions and help with this process. Best, Georg > On May 6, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi All > > A while ago we talked about the possibility of getting Kibble linked with > CHAOSS as an implementation of some of their defined metrics. We havent had > much activity on the list so I'd like to suggest that we could focus on > starting this work and getting it done. > > I think we need to somehow document how we are calculating certain metrics so > we can see if we currently align with what has been defined or if we are > doing it differently, there could be the possibility of proposing an updating > the existing definitions. > > So the approach I'm thinking of at the moment is: > > 1. Reach out the CHAOSS to understand what information they need about Kibble > to understand if we conform to any of their existing metrics > 2. Highlight where we are align / conform, and document where we dont > > What do people think? > > Thanks > Sharan > -- Georg Link (he/him)
