Hi Daniel, Enjoy your holidays!
Your work from 2018 would be a great starting point. CHAOSS released new metrics, so an updated may be needed. Thanks, Georg > On May 10, 2020, at 8:13 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sounds like an idea :) > Sharan and I did some matrices for this back in 2018(?) for FOSDEM that we > could use as a starting point. I'll look more into what we have and what we > need once I'm back from my involuntarily extended holiday (hopefully in 2 > weeks time). > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 06/05/2020 18.13, Georg Link wrote: >> Thanks Sharan, >> I am a CHAOSS co-lead and very much appreciate your initiative. >> 1. CHAOSS is (slowly) working on a conformance program that would officially >> allow Kibble to claim conformance with CHAOSS metrics. As we create this >> program, it would be amazing to have representation from Kibble in the >> conversation so that we can create the program in a way that will work for >> Kibble. >> 2. It would be amazing to know how Kibble implements the CHAOSS metrics >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__chaoss.community_metrics_&d=DwIDaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=B42ouk5wciVY15pss9RdhfyoeKc-RY8PU8WcPVcqLrU&s=RwobYHvOHns_WlLAuEbbdXO6WEL8B0yCKhXP89UrMXU&e= >> >. As Sharan said, CHAOSS is open to feedback and changing the metric based >> on your feedback. Any kind of feedback would be appreciated. >> After completing (2), it would be awesome to add in each metric a link to >> Kibble as known implementation. This will allow everyone looking at CHAOSS >> metrics to learn about Kibble. >> I’m happy to answer questions and help with this process. >> Best, >> Georg >>> On May 6, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All >>> >>> A while ago we talked about the possibility of getting Kibble linked with >>> CHAOSS as an implementation of some of their defined metrics. We havent had >>> much activity on the list so I'd like to suggest that we could focus on >>> starting this work and getting it done. >>> >>> I think we need to somehow document how we are calculating certain metrics >>> so we can see if we currently align with what has been defined or if we are >>> doing it differently, there could be the possibility of proposing an >>> updating the existing definitions. >>> >>> So the approach I'm thinking of at the moment is: >>> >>> 1. Reach out the CHAOSS to understand what information they need about >>> Kibble to understand if we conform to any of their existing metrics >>> 2. Highlight where we are align / conform, and document where we dont >>> >>> What do people think? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sharan >>> >> -- >> Georg Link >> (he/him) > -- Georg Link (he/him)
