Hi Sharan, Sounds great to me. Recently I got the opportunity to explore CHAOSS project and it seems very interesting. I would like to collaborate with you on this effort, please let me know if you need any assistance on this.
Best regards, Swapnil M Mane, www.apache.org On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:43 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sounds like an idea :) > Sharan and I did some matrices for this back in 2018(?) for FOSDEM that > we could use as a starting point. I'll look more into what we have and > what we need once I'm back from my involuntarily extended holiday > (hopefully in 2 weeks time). > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 06/05/2020 18.13, Georg Link wrote: > > Thanks Sharan, > > > > I am a CHAOSS co-lead and very much appreciate your initiative. > > > > 1. CHAOSS is (slowly) working on a conformance program that would > > officially allow Kibble to claim conformance with CHAOSS metrics. As we > > create this program, it would be amazing to have representation from Kibble > > in the conversation so that we can create the program in a way that will > > work for Kibble. > > > > 2. It would be amazing to know how Kibble implements the CHAOSS metrics > > <https://chaoss.community/metrics/>. As Sharan said, CHAOSS is open to > > feedback and changing the metric based on your feedback. Any kind of > > feedback would be appreciated. > > > > After completing (2), it would be awesome to add in each metric a link to > > Kibble as known implementation. This will allow everyone looking at CHAOSS > > metrics to learn about Kibble. > > > > I’m happy to answer questions and help with this process. > > > > Best, > > Georg > > > >> On May 6, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi All > >> > >> A while ago we talked about the possibility of getting Kibble linked with > >> CHAOSS as an implementation of some of their defined metrics. We havent > >> had much activity on the list so I'd like to suggest that we could focus > >> on starting this work and getting it done. > >> > >> I think we need to somehow document how we are calculating certain metrics > >> so we can see if we currently align with what has been defined or if we > >> are doing it differently, there could be the possibility of proposing an > >> updating the existing definitions. > >> > >> So the approach I'm thinking of at the moment is: > >> > >> 1. Reach out the CHAOSS to understand what information they need about > >> Kibble to understand if we conform to any of their existing metrics > >> 2. Highlight where we are align / conform, and document where we dont > >> > >> What do people think? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Sharan > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Georg Link > > (he/him) > > > > >
