Hi Georg Thanks for the feedback and am happy to follow your suggested approach.
Taking a look at our wiki we did start the outline of some work a while ago here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KIBBLE/Review+Kibble+Against+CHAOSS+Metrics I'll do a review to make sure we are aligned and have the most up to date metric list before starting the work. On the 'how' Kibble implements the metric - what are you expecting for that? A paragraph description? A code snippet? Thanks Sharan On 2020/05/06 23:13:01, Georg Link <gl...@unomaha.edu.INVALID> wrote: > Thanks Sharan, > > I am a CHAOSS co-lead and very much appreciate your initiative. > > 1. CHAOSS is (slowly) working on a conformance program that would officially > allow Kibble to claim conformance with CHAOSS metrics. As we create this > program, it would be amazing to have representation from Kibble in the > conversation so that we can create the program in a way that will work for > Kibble. > > 2. It would be amazing to know how Kibble implements the CHAOSS metrics > <https://chaoss.community/metrics/>. As Sharan said, CHAOSS is open to > feedback and changing the metric based on your feedback. Any kind of feedback > would be appreciated. > > After completing (2), it would be awesome to add in each metric a link to > Kibble as known implementation. This will allow everyone looking at CHAOSS > metrics to learn about Kibble. > > I’m happy to answer questions and help with this process. > > Best, > Georg > > > On May 6, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi All > > > > A while ago we talked about the possibility of getting Kibble linked with > > CHAOSS as an implementation of some of their defined metrics. We havent had > > much activity on the list so I'd like to suggest that we could focus on > > starting this work and getting it done. > > > > I think we need to somehow document how we are calculating certain metrics > > so we can see if we currently align with what has been defined or if we are > > doing it differently, there could be the possibility of proposing an > > updating the existing definitions. > > > > So the approach I'm thinking of at the moment is: > > > > 1. Reach out the CHAOSS to understand what information they need about > > Kibble to understand if we conform to any of their existing metrics > > 2. Highlight where we are align / conform, and document where we dont > > > > What do people think? > > > > Thanks > > Sharan > > > > > > -- > Georg Link > (he/him) > >
