Hi All Thanks very much for the feedback. I will take a look and see if we can start getting things moving tomorrow.
Thanks Sharan On Thu, 14 May 2020, 13:49 Swapnil M Mane, <swapnilmm...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you Georg for detailed notes, It sounds a good plan to me. > Will wait for inputs from Sharan and proceed accordingly. > > > Best regards, > Swapnil M Mane, > www.apache.org > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:42 PM Georg Link <gl...@unomaha.edu.invalid> > wrote: > > > > Hi Swapnil and Sharan, > > > > I don’t know how you want to proceed but I’ll make a suggestion. > > > > Phase 1: > > > > 1. Create a table that lists all CHAOSS metrics: chaoss.community/metrics > > 2. In one column, track the status of checking Kibble’s support for that > metric > > 3. A third column can contain comments and feedback to be shared with > the CHAOSS community > > 4. If Kibble has metrics that CHAOSS does not define, those can be added > to the table to be added to CHAOSS later. > > This could live in a GoogleDoc Sheet. > > > > Phase 2: > > Share feedback with CHAOSS community about how Kibble implements the > metrics and what metrics Kibble has that are not yet defined in CHAOSS. > > > > My goal would be to improve the CHAOSS metric definitions with your > feedback, list Kibble as a known implementation for these metrics, and add > metrics we don’t have yet. > > > > I’m happy to help in the process. Also, you can proceed differently, > this is just a suggestion. > > > > Best, > > Georg > > > > > > > On May 11, 2020, at 5:41 AM, Swapnil M Mane <swapnilmm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sharan, > > > Sounds great to me. > > > Recently I got the opportunity to explore CHAOSS project and it seems > > > very interesting. > > > I would like to collaborate with you on this effort, please let me > > > know if you need any assistance on this. > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Swapnil M Mane, > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apache.org&d=DwIFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=0-Ng-4k6AsHMF1n1DGRbStcwEto566Ng4hdtnNicJ9g&s=X0nJMuhICdIkhS3t1MMBPrE6GxTKL6jHKWcFtjvbSqQ&e= > < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apache.org&d=DwIFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=0-Ng-4k6AsHMF1n1DGRbStcwEto566Ng4hdtnNicJ9g&s=X0nJMuhICdIkhS3t1MMBPrE6GxTKL6jHKWcFtjvbSqQ&e= > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:43 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org > <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>> wrote: > > >> > > >> Sounds like an idea :) > > >> Sharan and I did some matrices for this back in 2018(?) for FOSDEM > that > > >> we could use as a starting point. I'll look more into what we have and > > >> what we need once I'm back from my involuntarily extended holiday > > >> (hopefully in 2 weeks time). > > >> > > >> With regards, > > >> Daniel. > > >> > > >> On 06/05/2020 18.13, Georg Link wrote: > > >>> Thanks Sharan, > > >>> > > >>> I am a CHAOSS co-lead and very much appreciate your initiative. > > >>> > > >>> 1. CHAOSS is (slowly) working on a conformance program that would > officially allow Kibble to claim conformance with CHAOSS metrics. As we > create this program, it would be amazing to have representation from Kibble > in the conversation so that we can create the program in a way that will > work for Kibble. > > >>> > > >>> 2. It would be amazing to know how Kibble implements the CHAOSS > metrics < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__chaoss.community_metrics_&d=DwIFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=0-Ng-4k6AsHMF1n1DGRbStcwEto566Ng4hdtnNicJ9g&s=V2xlf64CeqmVQC-3Q1VHxKQ3k40shQXCDLTEtOv856s&e= > < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__chaoss.community_metrics_&d=DwIFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=0-Ng-4k6AsHMF1n1DGRbStcwEto566Ng4hdtnNicJ9g&s=V2xlf64CeqmVQC-3Q1VHxKQ3k40shQXCDLTEtOv856s&e=> > >. As Sharan said, CHAOSS is open to feedback and changing the metric based > on your feedback. Any kind of feedback would be appreciated. > > >>> > > >>> After completing (2), it would be awesome to add in each metric a > link to Kibble as known implementation. This will allow everyone looking at > CHAOSS metrics to learn about Kibble. > > >>> > > >>> I’m happy to answer questions and help with this process. > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Georg > > >>> > > >>>> On May 6, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi All > > >>>> > > >>>> A while ago we talked about the possibility of getting Kibble > linked with CHAOSS as an implementation of some of their defined metrics. > We havent had much activity on the list so I'd like to suggest that we > could focus on starting this work and getting it done. > > >>>> > > >>>> I think we need to somehow document how we are calculating certain > metrics so we can see if we currently align with what has been defined or > if we are doing it differently, there could be the possibility of proposing > an updating the existing definitions. > > >>>> > > >>>> So the approach I'm thinking of at the moment is: > > >>>> > > >>>> 1. Reach out the CHAOSS to understand what information they need > about Kibble to understand if we conform to any of their existing metrics > > >>>> 2. Highlight where we are align / conform, and document where we > dont > > >>>> > > >>>> What do people think? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks > > >>>> Sharan > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Georg Link > > >>> (he/him) > > > > > > > > -- > > Georg Link > > (he/him) > > >
