They are super-stale and there is no easy mechanism for people to
announce their additions. I am not even sure the announcements are
welcome on the user mailing list.

It comes down to the funnel/workflow. At the moment, the workflow
makes it _hard_ to maintain those pages. CMM level 1 kind of hard.

Regards,
   Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853


On 24 November 2014 at 11:26, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> On the wiki are two pages listing out projects that use Solr:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrEcosystem
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr
>
> I noticed that they have become stale and was going to update them.   Maybe 
> they could have more prominence in the Solr site?  But keep them community 
> driven since things change so quickly.
>
> Eric
>
>
>> On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Well, a start would be to actually have an up-to-date list of Solr
>> clients. I have the list, if somebody knows where it should go (Ref
>> Guide). I don't want to contribute this to WIKI as we are trying to
>> get rid of it.
>>
>> Then somebody (Summer of Code project?) would derive from that a list
>> of clients that are up-to-date (a very different story). This would
>> require a high-level set of features that clients are expected to
>> cover. I have some thinking around that I am happy to share in a rough
>> form.
>>
>> I would also - as mentioned before - setup a mailing list for all the
>> client developers to discuss new features in a common way.
>>
>> Do not think of this as a primarily code problem - think of it as a
>> community consolidation and establishing clear interfaces to the
>> downstream projects.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Alex.
>>
>> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
>> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
>> Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
>>
>>
>> On 24 November 2014 at 10:24, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This has been a constant pain point for Solr. Java client is a first class
>>> client where it benefits from knowing the correct servers to communicate to
>>> because it is aware of the clusterstate. The java client also has the
>>> advantage of using the faster and compact binary format.
>>>
>>> We will need to build these basic capabilities built in other languages such
>>> as  C++, C# and provide bindings for other languages
>>> . We are aware of this need and any suggestions to address this are welcome
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Anurag Sharma <anura...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Solr interface is through REST API's which makes it easy to integrate with
>>>> any platform and do binding any language.
>>>>
>>>> Each developer have to write common code to do the api bindings if using
>>>> Solr in non java framework/platform. This overhead can be reduced by
>>>> building client sdk's/libraries for popular languages and platforms e.g.
>>>> - web: js, ruby, python
>>>> - mobile: Objective C, Swift, C#
>>>> - other: C++,  Scala, perl, php
>>>>
>>>> Also, this can significantly reduce time to Solr on-boarding when using
>>>> non java platform.
>>>>
>>>> Suggestions?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> Noble Paul
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
> Co-Author: Apache Solr 3 Enterprise Search Server
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of 
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to