Hello, I raised SOLR-15410 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15410> yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC logging when using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if somebody could have a look at it in time for 8.9 that would be great
Thanks, Colvin On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mayya, > > I would like to backport LUCENE-9935 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9935>, which enables > bulk-merge for stored fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The > patch is ready <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2494>, but we > prefer to give CI some cycles before backporting. Please let me know if > it's okay with the release plan. > > Thanks, > Nhat > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 should be >> investigated before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker? >> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to help out: >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495 >>> >>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main branch >>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking: >>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more difficult >>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great change >>> moving forwards though) >>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch which >>> add noise to merging against old code. >>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional tricky >>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport (due to >>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong. >>> >>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, it >>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test >>> coverage that helps combat risks. >>> >>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x IMO: >>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: it is >>> harder. >>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer than >>> usual? even a few days really helps. >>> >>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks everyone, >>> > >>> > Adrien, I am happy to try to be a release manager for this release. >>> > >>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are merged to 8.x >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 into some sort of 8x. >>> I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of the lucene tickets that are >>> related, and hope to work on the third tomorrow.... >>> >> >>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting for the >>> version integrated with the final form of the Lucene tickets before delving >>> further. Hopefully this week I can start on a patch that does that. >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, a >>> performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work on this as soon >>> as possible. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> +1 >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Hello everyone, >>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been more >>> than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released. >>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Adrien >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>> >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> >
