Could someone else please take a look at SOLR-15056? This is a small blast radius change that improves the circuit breakers. It includes unit tests and documentation and has been ready since January.
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96/files <https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96/files> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056> wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Jun 1, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Mayya Sharipova > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID> wrote: > > Thank you for the update, Houston. > > I've started the release process, the branch 8.9 is now cut. > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:21 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org > <mailto:hous...@apache.org>> wrote: > Mayya, SOLR-14978 is now in 8.x. So no longer a blocker. > > - Houston > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:42 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org > <mailto:dsmi...@apache.org>> wrote: > SOLR-15412 is rather serious as the title suggests. I haven't been tracking > the progress so if it's already resolved, that's unknown to me and isn't > reflected in JIRA. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley> > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Mayya Sharipova > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > I wonder if everyone is ok for May 31st (Monday) as the date for the feature > freeze date and branch cut? > I've noticed that `releaseWizard.py` is also asking for the length of feature > freeze. What is the custom length to put there? > > Looks like Lucene > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LUCENE/versions/12349562> doesn't > have any unresolved issues for 8.9. > SOLR <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12349563> has: > - SOLR-15412 Strict validation on Replica metadata can cause complete > outage (Looks like it may be resolved already?) > - SOLR-15410 GC log is directed to console when starting Solr with Java 11 > Open J9 on Windows > - SOLR-15056 CPU circuit breaker needs to use CPU utilization, not Unix load > average > > Are we ok to postpone these issues to later releases if they are not resolved > and merged before feature freeze? > > Thank you. > > > > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Colvin Cowie <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com > <mailto:colvin.cowie....@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hello, > Eric was going to have a look at the PR. > But if it isn't done in time then I don't think it needs to block the release > > Thanks > > On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya Sharipova > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Hello Colvin, > I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the Lucene/Solr 8.9 > release? > Should we have a deadline for feature freeze? Say May 30th (Sunday)? > > Thank you. > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com > <mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com>> wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com > <mailto:colvin.cowie....@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC logging > > when using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if somebody could have a > > look at it in time for 8.9 that would be great > > > > Thanks, > > Colvin > > > > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co > > <mailto:nhat.ngu...@elastic.co>.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mayya, > >> > >> I would like to backport LUCENE-9935, which enables bulk-merge for stored > >> fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The patch is ready, but we > >> prefer to give CI some cycles before backporting. Please let me know if > >> it's okay with the release plan. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Nhat > >> > >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:gus.h...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378> should be investigated > >>> before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker? > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com > >>> <mailto:rcm...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to help out: > >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495 > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495> > >>>> > >>>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main branch > >>>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking: > >>>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more difficult > >>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great change > >>>> moving forwards though) > >>>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch which > >>>> add noise to merging against old code. > >>>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional tricky > >>>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport (due to > >>>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong. > >>>> > >>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, it > >>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test > >>>> coverage that helps combat risks. > >>>> > >>>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x IMO: > >>>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: it is > >>>> harder. > >>>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer than > >>>> usual? even a few days really helps. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova > >>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co>.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > Thanks everyone, > >>>> > > >>>> > Adrien, I am happy to try to be a release manager for this release. > >>>> > > >>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are merged to 8.x > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com > >>>> > <mailto:gus.h...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get > >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 > >>>> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597> into some sort of > >>>> >> 8x. I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of the lucene > >>>> >> tickets that are related, and hope to work on the third tomorrow.... > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting for the > >>>> >> version integrated with the final form of the Lucene tickets before > >>>> >> delving further. Hopefully this week I can start on a patch that does > >>>> >> that. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com > >>>> >> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, a > >>>> >>> performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work on this as > >>>> >>> soon as possible. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com > >>>> >>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> +1 > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager? > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >>>> >>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> a > >>>> >>>> écrit : > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> +1 > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova > >>>> >>>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co > >>>> >>>>> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co>.invalid> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone, > >>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been more > >>>> >>>>>> than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released. > >>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series. > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> Thanks. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> -- > >>>> >>> Adrien > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com <http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> > >>>> >> (work) > >>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com <http://www.the111shift.com/> (play) > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com <http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> (work) > >>> http://www.the111shift.com <http://www.the111shift.com/> (play) > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >
