+1

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC logging when 
> using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if somebody could have a look at 
> it in time for 8.9 that would be great
>
> Thanks,
> Colvin
>
> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mayya,
>>
>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9935, which enables bulk-merge for stored 
>> fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The patch is ready, but we 
>> prefer to give CI some cycles before backporting. Please let me know if it's 
>> okay with the release plan.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nhat
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 should be 
>>> investigated before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker?
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to help out:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main branch
>>>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking:
>>>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more difficult
>>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great change
>>>> moving forwards though)
>>>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch which
>>>> add noise to merging against old code.
>>>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional tricky
>>>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport (due to
>>>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong.
>>>>
>>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, it
>>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test
>>>> coverage that helps combat risks.
>>>>
>>>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x IMO:
>>>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: it is 
>>>> harder.
>>>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer than
>>>> usual? even a few days really helps.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > Adrien, I  am happy to try to be a release manager for this release.
>>>> >
>>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are merged to 8.x
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get 
>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 into some sort of 8x. 
>>>> >> I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of the lucene tickets that 
>>>> >> are related, and hope to work on the third tomorrow....
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting for the 
>>>> >> version integrated with the final form of the Lucene tickets before 
>>>> >> delving further. Hopefully this week I can start on a patch that does 
>>>> >> that.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, a 
>>>> >>> performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work on this as 
>>>> >>> soon as possible.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> +1
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>>>> >>>> <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> +1
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova 
>>>> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been more 
>>>> >>>>>> than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released.
>>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Thanks.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Adrien
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to