On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:19 +0100, Steven Pauwels wrote: [snip] > I think that if someone has a violent objection to the label that the > community chooses by vote, he should start his own OOo distribution. It > is completely respectless to the efforts put in by the art project, and > the decission made by the marketing project members, to use another. > This is one of the reasons people find it difficult to work for OOo > marketing. For Gods sake... make up your minds... > You vote but nevertheless we should use them all... this is > contra-productive and completely demotivating.
It's not intended to be. We're an open-source project, not a monopoly supplier - we can't say "You must put this 'Fred Computers Inc recommends OpenOffice.org' logo on every advert or we'll cut you off our preferred price plan" > John... Take your co-leads responsability to actually lead. We can only lead by the excellence of what we do. If we provide world class artwork, why would anyone choose *not* to use it? John --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
