On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 18:12 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:

> >> Also the need of more non profit entities in countries so that
> >> openoffice.org scale to large deployments. basically we are finding that
> >> OOo vendors hav e a hard time justifiying the product and the brand.
> >
> > Not sure why not for profits will do that any better than profit making
> > companies. Basically a not for profit still needs a revenue source to
> > cover operating costs. It needs business models that are not based on
> > selling software licenses. I did some training yesterday not
> > specifically related to OOo but OOo went down very well with the
> > teachers involved when I showed them how to get it and why it would be
> > useful to them. I get paid for doing that training so its sustainable.
> 
> Hi Ian, you miss the point here, the problem is not being a for profit or  
> not for profit. What the governments need is a legal entity of  
> OpenOffice.org. 

That makes more sense. 

>  The companies that offer the services will use  
> OpenOffice.org and generate a profit, but the actual OpenOffice.org 'name  
> holder' should be legally stablish in the country.

Needs a foundation in each country then. I'm not holding my breath :-)
In fact a company that is stable offering to support it is probably good
enough. Moodle seems OK in this respect and has 50% foorhold in the UK
FE market. In fact i expect it to sweep theough the secondary sector
too.

> > I can't see any economic reason for a system builder installing MS Works
> > on a computer instead of OOo unless M$ is actually paying them to do
> > it.
> 
> Legally a lot of things apartently doesn't make sense until you get  
> contracts in the mix. For example the OOXML was a clear example when OOo  
> members legally couldn't represent OOo because legally OOo doesn't exist  
> like Microsoft does.

So how come Dell can put Ubuntu (with OOo in its machines and Lenovo is
considering doing it for laptops?) Canonical - so as long as you have
some stable company pulling things together it doesn't seem too
important how the individual products are backed.

Ian
-- 
New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications
www.theINGOTs.org

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to