Am 01/02/17 um 21:01 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Christian,
>>
>> Please read Tibor's concerns:
>> - big change,
>> - near release (with parallel branches for JUnit 5)
>> And I'll add: noise, like addition of final, reordering of imports,
>> addition/
>> suppression of empty lines
>>
>> Please follow Tibor's request, which tries to be as kind as possible:
>>> So now please revert last change [1] and let's start from the ground.
>>> We should again learn from the beginning and start communicating in the
>>> community; otherwise this is the end of the project.
>>
> 
> In my uninteresting opinion, Tibor should formally veto the commit. That's
> not un-nice, it's the way to express, clearly and crisply, his view that
> the change is not acceptable without further discussion and refinement. On
> the other hand, I don't think that the remarks about 'playgrounds' or
> 'sandboxes' are appropriate or respectful. We should all assume good intent
> and professional intent. We are running a CTR system here, and so we should
> expect something like this to happen from time to time, where someone
> commits with the best of intentions and someone else feels strongly that
> more work is needed.
> 
> Once Tibor has vetoed, Christian should revert, and then the process should
> unfold from there.
> 

This part of the commit does not correct any exception suppressed
incorrectly, it really fixes a resource leak (lacking calls to close).

<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=commitdiff;h=e5a6b9c8d4f514100a01dea2acf1fb059e294968#patch11>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to