I have created a pull request
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/139
The build passed successfully.
Christian, Benedikt please have a look and I will amend the HEAD revision
in origin/master.
Thx.

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote:

> Christian thx for the logs.
> Can you please send me *log.txt* from these folders?
> surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire34SecurityManagerIT_
> testSecurityManager
> surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashe
> sToTestsIT_crashInFork
> surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashe
> sToTestsIT_crashInReusableFork
> surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashe
> sToTestsIT_crashInSingleUseFork
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> Sorry for late reply.
>> I do not want to remove your work from the commit - it's not fair to
>> anyone and therefore I would like to open PR at GitHub and I would like to
>> amend the commit with my proposal and *you guys feel free to comment on
>> the PR - everybody is welcome*.
>> I understand that this takes your and my spare time but that's the only
>> way we can friendly continue.
>> In my experiences the professionals must communicate in code review and
>> however they have good technical understanding always they may have
>> different decisions and consensus is the only way we will coexist.
>>
>> :) I will send you link in GitHub in a day.
>>
>> I see we will make good job together!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I also have such feeling that Maven became a playground.
>>> Last week I saw it in reality and after Robert told me we made
>>> playground in our sources I could not believe this could happen in such
>>> professional project like Maven.
>>>
>>> I would appreciate it if the change [1] 
>>> e5a6b9c8d4f514100a01dea2acf1fb059e294968
>>> was reverted in Surefire and a new pull request was open at GitHub making
>>> the code review.
>>> I use to do this with myself with big changes and I am waiting for
>>> anyone in the PR. We are doing the same with one excellent guy from another
>>> ASF project who is supporting us with JUnit 5 addons and this works pretty
>>> well.
>>>
>>> The situation in Surefire is quite ambitious to release Versions 2.19.2
>>> and 3.0.0-RC1 in parallel with 2.19.3 JDK9 support and JUnit 5 support now
>>> in January.
>>>
>>> The problem is that these Surefire three plugins are so easy to crash
>>> with whatever changes and therefore I implemented dumping internal errors
>>> to dump files which will help us investigate two Jira issues - critical and
>>> blocker. And there are much more thinks to talk about the features...
>>>
>>> I would really appreciate if we could behave like ordinal users in our
>>> project and provide a pull request in GitHub and call for code review.
>>> This does not mean only Surefire.
>>>
>>> So now please revert last change [1] and let's start from the ground.
>>> We should again learn from the beginning and start communicating in the
>>> community; otherwise this is the end of the project.
>>>
>>> [1] https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.g
>>> it&a=commit&h=e5a6b9c8d4f514100a01dea2acf1fb059e294968
>>>
>>> We can talk about more visions, or I can open Wiki for such talks which
>>> I think we will appreciate because everybody can add her/his visions.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Tibor
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to