I have created a pull request https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/139 The build passed successfully. Christian, Benedikt please have a look and I will amend the HEAD revision in origin/master. Thx.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > Christian thx for the logs. > Can you please send me *log.txt* from these folders? > surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire34SecurityManagerIT_ > testSecurityManager > surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashe > sToTestsIT_crashInFork > surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashe > sToTestsIT_crashInReusableFork > surefire-integration-tests/target/Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashe > sToTestsIT_crashInSingleUseFork > > Cheers > Tibor > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hello guys, >> >> Sorry for late reply. >> I do not want to remove your work from the commit - it's not fair to >> anyone and therefore I would like to open PR at GitHub and I would like to >> amend the commit with my proposal and *you guys feel free to comment on >> the PR - everybody is welcome*. >> I understand that this takes your and my spare time but that's the only >> way we can friendly continue. >> In my experiences the professionals must communicate in code review and >> however they have good technical understanding always they may have >> different decisions and consensus is the only way we will coexist. >> >> :) I will send you link in GitHub in a day. >> >> I see we will make good job together! >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I also have such feeling that Maven became a playground. >>> Last week I saw it in reality and after Robert told me we made >>> playground in our sources I could not believe this could happen in such >>> professional project like Maven. >>> >>> I would appreciate it if the change [1] >>> e5a6b9c8d4f514100a01dea2acf1fb059e294968 >>> was reverted in Surefire and a new pull request was open at GitHub making >>> the code review. >>> I use to do this with myself with big changes and I am waiting for >>> anyone in the PR. We are doing the same with one excellent guy from another >>> ASF project who is supporting us with JUnit 5 addons and this works pretty >>> well. >>> >>> The situation in Surefire is quite ambitious to release Versions 2.19.2 >>> and 3.0.0-RC1 in parallel with 2.19.3 JDK9 support and JUnit 5 support now >>> in January. >>> >>> The problem is that these Surefire three plugins are so easy to crash >>> with whatever changes and therefore I implemented dumping internal errors >>> to dump files which will help us investigate two Jira issues - critical and >>> blocker. And there are much more thinks to talk about the features... >>> >>> I would really appreciate if we could behave like ordinal users in our >>> project and provide a pull request in GitHub and call for code review. >>> This does not mean only Surefire. >>> >>> So now please revert last change [1] and let's start from the ground. >>> We should again learn from the beginning and start communicating in the >>> community; otherwise this is the end of the project. >>> >>> [1] https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.g >>> it&a=commit&h=e5a6b9c8d4f514100a01dea2acf1fb059e294968 >>> >>> We can talk about more visions, or I can open Wiki for such talks which >>> I think we will appreciate because everybody can add her/his visions. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Tibor >>> >> >> >