Am 01/02/17 um 21:01 schrieb Benson Margulies: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > >> Christian, >> >> Please read Tibor's concerns: >> - big change, >> - near release (with parallel branches for JUnit 5) >> And I'll add: noise, like addition of final, reordering of imports, >> addition/ >> suppression of empty lines >> >> Please follow Tibor's request, which tries to be as kind as possible: >>> So now please revert last change [1] and let's start from the ground. >>> We should again learn from the beginning and start communicating in the >>> community; otherwise this is the end of the project. >> > > In my uninteresting opinion, Tibor should formally veto the commit. That's > not un-nice, it's the way to express, clearly and crisply, his view that > the change is not acceptable without further discussion and refinement. On > the other hand, I don't think that the remarks about 'playgrounds' or > 'sandboxes' are appropriate or respectful. We should all assume good intent > and professional intent. We are running a CTR system here, and so we should > expect something like this to happen from time to time, where someone > commits with the best of intentions and someone else feels strongly that > more work is needed. > > Once Tibor has vetoed, Christian should revert, and then the process should > unfold from there.
Tibor could just run "git revert hash" himself and I would not object. I do read commit messages. This would not help stopping that question mark above my head from growing. Big change? Come on. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
