Hi, 2008/6/25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > While code duplication is never nice, I think it would be better for > tomahawk 1.1.x and 1.2.x to continue to have these components internally, > and for commons to have a separate version. It also means that commons can > clean up the API without breaking tomahawk users. Yes, it does mean having > to apply fixes in two places (tomahawk, commons) but so does the alternative > (tomahawk 1.x, commons).
This means to apply fixes in four places: tomahawk1.1, tomahawk1.2, commons1.1 and commons1.2. BTW: -1 for the alternative (tomahawk 1.x, commons). Regards, Volker > > Regards, > Simon > > -- inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH Bismarckstraße 13 | 26122 Oldenburg Tel.: +49 441 4082 356 | FAX: +49 441 4082 355 | www.inexso.de