Why not no "new" converters and validators in tomahawk (any
version/branch), and the sandbox converters and validators goes
directly to commons. Glauco P. Gomes Volker Weber escreveu: Hi, 2008/6/25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:While code duplication is never nice, I think it would be better for tomahawk 1.1.x and 1.2.x to continue to have these components internally, and for commons to have a separate version. It also means that commons can clean up the API without breaking tomahawk users. Yes, it does mean having to apply fixes in two places (tomahawk, commons) but so does the alternative (tomahawk 1.x, commons).This means to apply fixes in four places: tomahawk1.1, tomahawk1.2, commons1.1 and commons1.2.BTW: -1 for the alternative (tomahawk 1.x, commons). Regards, VolkerRegards, Simon |
- [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and validators to to... Leonardo Uribe
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and validat... Leonardo Uribe
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and validat... Volker Weber
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and val... Leonardo Uribe
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and... Matthias Wessendorf
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and validat... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and val... Volker Weber
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and... Glauco P. Gomes
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and val... Mike Kienenberger
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and... simon
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters... Mike Kienenberger
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox conve... Leonardo Uribe
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox conve... Volker Weber
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox c... Mike Kienenberger
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandb... Leonardo Uribe
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandb... simon
- Re: [VOTE] Upgrade sandbox converters and validat... Hazem Saleh