No decision yet...
I would call it extensions, or something alike not really dojo
maybe we add other frameworks as well in the long run.
Werner
Ernst Fastl schrieb:
If moving to sandbox complicates the process a lot then maybe it would
be the better idea to, as you initially suggested, start a "tomahawk-dojo"
migrate and move the dojo stuff in the sandbox to there and get rid of dojo
in the sandbox. Has there already been a decision if we want to have
the dojo stuff in a separate module? If not - would that be subject for a vote?
On 7/7/08, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ernst Fastl schrieb:
Hi Werner,
I think it would be good to have it in MyFaces either as a subproject
or for starter
if anyone feels it might not be mature enough yet in the sandbox. It
would be great
to have it around in tomahawk seeing we could really use some "new fancy"
Web 2.0 components to make tomahawk again more attractive for the end user
in times of RichFaces, ICEFaces, ...
just my 2 cents
Ernst
Ok adding it to the sandbox would mean that we break the existing dojo
based components a mixing of dojo 0.4 components and 1.1 components
would not work in the same page.
We can move over the existing ones anyway, but that would take some time
also the removal of the dojo codebase out of core tomahawk.
I would add a comment in the demo that mixing both codebases for now is
not possible until we have moved the codebase over.
That would be the way for the sandbox.
(Moving over the sandbox comoponents is on my todo list ones I have all
dojo components working reasonably well)
