As I'm an expert in architecture :D kidding

Can it be possible to have like two repository one for netbeans-platform and 
netbeans with platform "seen as library" ?
With netbeans-platform jdk8 and the netbeans with jdk 8+ ?

Regards
Eric
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Neil C Smith <[email protected]> 
Envoyé : vendredi 28 février 2020 11:29
À : dev <[email protected]>
Objet : Re: Platform has to continue to support Java 8, imho was: Pull the plug 
from Java 8 in 12.1?

On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 09:55, Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]> wrote:
> PS: The `nb-javac` issue: IGV is actually using Java editing modules, 
> so we are interested in having nb-javac working on JDK8. We bundle the 
> `nb-javac` as part of IGV - e.g. there is no need to download 
> `nb-javac`. Enough to use it when present. I assume we can help with 
> the maintenance of this part of the code base. Dušan Bálek, Tomáš 
> Zezula, Sváťa Dědic and last but not least Jan Lahoda have a lot of 
> expertise in this area and can make sure parsing of Java sources on 
> JDK8 still works (even it will not be used by Apache NetBeans IDE itself).

This to me is the crux of the issue.  My comment on the users@ thread was more 
with thought of stopping default/official support of Java editing when running 
on JDK 8.  ie. at least making nb-javac far more optional from 12.1 than it is 
now.

It does not seem sustainable to keep telling people with refactoring issues to 
uninstall nb-javac.  Somehow those issues need addressing, particularly if 
they're in code we have no control of here.  I think more help on the 
maintenance of this part, particularly with regard to any updates for Java 14 
support, might be good in the 12.0 timeframe.
Java 13 updates for nb-javac during the 11.2 release (which also required 
11.2u1) were a PITA!  That was my real reason for being in favour of shifting 
the whole schedule back a month - not Eric's Xmas.
;-)
I'm sad :D

Longer term we need to start making nb-javac less (then not) required.
At least initially making it something legacy to opt in to rather than opt out 
of seems a good move?  From an ASF point of view I think the way nb-javac and 
JavaFX are currently installed may be pushing at the limits of compliance.

Best wishes,

Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to