Hi, Why not NuttxKernel and NuttxApp?
Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 18 nov. 2022 à 15:43, Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > But NuttX has more features than traditional RTOS(e.g. FreeRTOS). Actually, > Xiaomi uses it in the IoT space which has less real time requirements. > Other similar OS(e.g. Zephyr) doesn't append rtos suffix. > So, I prefer keep nuttx and nuttx-apps. > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:39 PM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hi >> I think that nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps is cleaner >> >> Best regards >> Alin >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, 01:11 Alan C. Assis, <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I like the second option: >>> >>> 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps >>> >>> It makes clear that it is a RTOS :-) >>> >>> BR, >>> >>> Alan >>> >>> On 11/17/22, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> As mentioned in the other thread, the repos need to be renamed to >>>> remove "incubating". >>>> >>>> In the discussion from a few months ago [1] several reasons were given >>>> why not to use hyphens in the names (they confuse some tools and >>>> underscores are safer). >>>> >>>> Two possibilities for repo names were given: >>>> >>>> 1) nuttx and nuttx_apps >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps >>>> >>>> Which do we want? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nathan >>>> >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/8fn2m2v8qd3sl9r8jg4bs2f9xq7mwg85 >>>> >>> >>
