> I vote for nuttx, nuttx-apps

+1

David

-----Original Message-----
From: James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 11:21 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: New names of repositories


That’s right! and underscores are difficult to see when the file name is
displayed as an underlined link

you also can’t use underscores
with AWS S3 …
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/bucketnamingrules.html

Finally, the Google search engine treats, the hyphen( ‘-‘ ) separator as a
word separator but the same does not apply to underscores (‘_’)

yes, underscore is great for C code because it is the “space which is not a
space” - however, for file names, because of the reasons above it’s
problematic…

I vote for nuttx, nuttx-apps



> On Nov 18, 2022, at 7:07 AM, TimH <t...@jti.uk.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> I see all the other two-word Apache repositories use hyphens not
> underscores, and on GitHub they are URLs which as has been pointed out
> should ideally be hyphenated?
>
> To me the underscore looks wrong...but, in the grand scheme of things,
> it's just a name and, like Sebastien, I will not lose sleep. I lose enough
> of that already, getting trying to get NuttX working on the processor I'm
> using LOL.
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would also very much prefer nuttx and nuttx_apps but the other
>> option will not prevent me from sleeping well at night.
>>
>> Sebastien
>>
>>> Le 18/11/2022 à 15:46, Gregory Nutt a écrit :
>>>
>>>> But NuttX has more features than traditional RTOS(e.g. FreeRTOS).
>>>> Actually,
>>>> Xiaomi uses it in the IoT space which has less real time requirements.
>>>> Other similar OS(e.g. Zephyr) doesn't append rtos suffix.
>>>> So, I prefer keep nuttx and nuttx-apps.
>>>
>>> I just endorsed nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps, but Xiao is correct.
>>> nuttx_rtos is redundant since nuttx is the name of the RTOS.
>>> nuttx_apps are miscellaneous applications tailored for the NuttX RTOS.
>>> It really is semantically cleaner.
>>>
>

Reply via email to