Thanks All,
I will put the wiki page in Attic.
I totally agree Aditya, good idea. It seems we need to ask Infra for that. I see no way to do it ourselves. Also it seems the "labels" comes from
doap_OFBiz.rdf under site repo.
So maybe Infra can use the description there or, as you suggest, something more elaborated to welcome users that we would define (tht maybe put in
doap_OFBiz.rdf) with a link to OFBiz site
For the link to Jira it depends on README.adoc. But if we put a link to OFBiz
site then the link to Jira is there.
Opinions?
Jacques
Le 26/05/2020 à 14:25, Aditya Sharma a écrit :
+1 Jacques. I think we are good with Jira for now and if needed we can add
a link to Jira in description like Apache Arrow[1]
Also, I would suggest that we should change the description of the
repository[2] from "Mirror of Apache OFBiz Framework" to a description of
OFBiz and the official website link similar to Apache Arrow.
1. https://github.com/apache/arrow#getting-involved
2. https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Sharma
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:42 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
+1
Thanks Jacques,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 25.05.20 um 18:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi All,
I believe we are now pragmatically using JIRA + Patch, or GH + PR.
Remains the question about allowing the creation of issues in GH. It
seems to me that nobody actually asked for that since Jira is enough
for our needs.
So I should not need more than what we use currently and can put
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Question%3A+GitHub+or+Jira+or+both
in Attic now, right?
Jacques
Le 18/03/2020 à 18:22, Michael Brohl a écrit :
+1 James!
Thanks,
Michael
Am 18.03.20 um 17:13 schrieb James Yong:
Hi all,
I personally feel we should allow both JIRA and Github for issue
management, and let contributers use their own judgement on which
one to use. JIRA contains wealth of information and many open issues
for review, while Github allows easier review of source codes.
So do either JIRA + Patch, or GH + PR.
Regards,
James
On 2020/03/14 10:43:31, Jacques Le Roux
<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi Benjamin, All,
That's a good point indeed. And we 1st need to clearly define what
are the old and the new processes. Here is a try:
The "old process" (not so old, changed with Git replacing Svn,
hence the discussion) is
* use Jira to create issues with possibly attached patches and
discussion there. With all what Jira affords...
* You can also link a GH PR from Jira. And have a patch, then it
begins to be confusing (which one is the later, etc.)
* You can create a PR in GH and discuss it there, nothing else.
There should not be crossed discussions in Jira and GH
* I certainly miss other points, that's the gist
The new process is not clearly defined, here are 2 possible versions:
* Jira is only used for history reason, no more issue creations
allowed
* GH is used not only for PR but also to create issues (needs a
PMC agreement). It's then a replacement of Jira and we need to be
quite careful
doing so.
* Jira continues to be used as is. With IMO some restrictions,
like: if you have a patch you don't create a PR, it's one or the
other way.
* GH is used not only for PR but also to create issues (needs a
PMC agreement) an discuss them there. PR or attached patch can be
used to contribute.
As you see, for me the question is not "GitHub or Jira" but
"GitHub or Jira or both" I have changed the title of the related
wiki page accordingly:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Question%3A+GitHub+or+Jira+or+both
HTH
Jacques
Le 13/03/2020 à 17:41, Benjamin Jugl a écrit :
I have been following this discussion for a while. However, I
still wonder if this discussion is about which of the two options
is the better one.
In my opinion, the discussion should rather be about whether the
potential benefits of a new process justify the effort to change
the old one. It
seems to me at least that this aspect is being neglected a bit.
Am 13.03.20 um 10:24 schrieb Michael Brohl:
Hi all,
I'd like to encourage everyone to visit the wiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/GITHUB+plus+GIT+VS+JIRA+plus+GIT,
read
carefully, check, dicuss and ask questions to get to a good
information base for an important decision to make.
Thanks everyone,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 12.03.20 um 17:28 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
You are all invited to review, discuss in comments and possibly
add pro and cons on this page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/GITHUB+plus+GIT+VS+JIRA+plus+GIT
It would else become unreadable here...
Hopefully we will get to a consensus...
Jacques
