>> So maybe Infra can use the description there +1 for using the description
>> For the link to Jira it depends on README.adoc. But if we put a link to OFBiz site then the link to Jira is there. Makes sense Thanks and regards, Aditya Sharma On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:22 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Thanks All, > > I will put the wiki page in Attic. > > I totally agree Aditya, good idea. It seems we need to ask Infra for that. > I see no way to do it ourselves. Also it seems the "labels" comes from > doap_OFBiz.rdf under site repo. > So maybe Infra can use the description there or, as you suggest, something > more elaborated to welcome users that we would define (tht maybe put in > doap_OFBiz.rdf) with a link to OFBiz site > > For the link to Jira it depends on README.adoc. But if we put a link to > OFBiz site then the link to Jira is there. > > Opinions? > > Jacques > > Le 26/05/2020 à 14:25, Aditya Sharma a écrit : > > +1 Jacques. I think we are good with Jira for now and if needed we can > add > > a link to Jira in description like Apache Arrow[1] > > Also, I would suggest that we should change the description of the > > repository[2] from "Mirror of Apache OFBiz Framework" to a description of > > OFBiz and the official website link similar to Apache Arrow. > > > > 1. https://github.com/apache/arrow#getting-involved > > 2. https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Aditya Sharma > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:42 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Thanks Jacques, > >> > >> Michael Brohl > >> > >> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > >> > >> > >> Am 25.05.20 um 18:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I believe we are now pragmatically using JIRA + Patch, or GH + PR. > >>> > >>> Remains the question about allowing the creation of issues in GH. It > >>> seems to me that nobody actually asked for that since Jira is enough > >>> for our needs. > >>> > >>> So I should not need more than what we use currently and can put > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Question%3A+GitHub+or+Jira+or+both > >>> in Attic now, right? > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> Le 18/03/2020 à 18:22, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >>>> +1 James! > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Michael > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Am 18.03.20 um 17:13 schrieb James Yong: > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I personally feel we should allow both JIRA and Github for issue > >>>>> management, and let contributers use their own judgement on which > >>>>> one to use. JIRA contains wealth of information and many open issues > >>>>> for review, while Github allows easier review of source codes. > >>>>> So do either JIRA + Patch, or GH + PR. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> James > >>>>> > >>>>> On 2020/03/14 10:43:31, Jacques Le Roux > >>>>> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi Benjamin, All, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's a good point indeed. And we 1st need to clearly define what > >>>>>> are the old and the new processes. Here is a try: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The "old process" (not so old, changed with Git replacing Svn, > >>>>>> hence the discussion) is > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * use Jira to create issues with possibly attached patches and > >>>>>> discussion there. With all what Jira affords... > >>>>>> * You can also link a GH PR from Jira. And have a patch, then it > >>>>>> begins to be confusing (which one is the later, etc.) > >>>>>> * You can create a PR in GH and discuss it there, nothing else. > >>>>>> There should not be crossed discussions in Jira and GH > >>>>>> * I certainly miss other points, that's the gist > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The new process is not clearly defined, here are 2 possible > versions: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * Jira is only used for history reason, no more issue creations > >>>>>> allowed > >>>>>> * GH is used not only for PR but also to create issues (needs a > >>>>>> PMC agreement). It's then a replacement of Jira and we need to be > >>>>>> quite careful > >>>>>> doing so. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * Jira continues to be used as is. With IMO some restrictions, > >>>>>> like: if you have a patch you don't create a PR, it's one or the > >>>>>> other way. > >>>>>> * GH is used not only for PR but also to create issues (needs a > >>>>>> PMC agreement) an discuss them there. PR or attached patch can be > >>>>>> used to contribute. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As you see, for me the question is not "GitHub or Jira" but > >>>>>> "GitHub or Jira or both" I have changed the title of the related > >>>>>> wiki page accordingly: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Question%3A+GitHub+or+Jira+or+both > >>>>>> > >>>>>> HTH > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le 13/03/2020 à 17:41, Benjamin Jugl a écrit : > >>>>>>> I have been following this discussion for a while. However, I > >>>>>>> still wonder if this discussion is about which of the two options > >>>>>>> is the better one. > >>>>>>> In my opinion, the discussion should rather be about whether the > >>>>>>> potential benefits of a new process justify the effort to change > >>>>>>> the old one. It > >>>>>>> seems to me at least that this aspect is being neglected a bit. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am 13.03.20 um 10:24 schrieb Michael Brohl: > >>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'd like to encourage everyone to visit the wiki page > >>>>>>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/GITHUB+plus+GIT+VS+JIRA+plus+GIT > , > >> > >>>>>>>> read > >>>>>>>> carefully, check, dicuss and ask questions to get to a good > >>>>>>>> information base for an important decision to make. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks everyone, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Michael Brohl > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Am 12.03.20 um 17:28 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >>>>>>>>> You are all invited to review, discuss in comments and possibly > >>>>>>>>> add pro and cons on this page > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/GITHUB+plus+GIT+VS+JIRA+plus+GIT > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It would else become unreadable here... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hopefully we will get to a consensus... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >
