We could remove multiflex as well right? That's not even used on the backend. I could be seriously wrong here, so let me know.
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > +1 - I'm for it. Just remember to get the screenshot from demo before > you remove it :) I'll be happy to do it once we have a few more > votes. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > +1 for Bluelight in gallery and not in OFBiz OOTB as already > proposed > > (easier maintenance) > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> > > > Should we do the same for Bluelight? > > > > > > -Adrian > > > > > > Tim Ruppert wrote: > > >> Smooth Feather has been posted to the Visual Themes page and can > > now be removed by anyone who has rights. I'm not sure where I > > >> ever rememthemes is classified, but I'll give it a whirl and > will > > report back. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Tim > > >> -- > > >> Tim Ruppert > > >> HotWax Media > > >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >> > > >> o:801.649.6594 > > >> f:801.649.6595 > > >> > > >> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Yeah, I can get behind that for sure. Btw, Jacques, I think we > > keep > > >>> the Flat Grey forever - no reason to deprecate that one - just > > the > > >>> ones that aren't going to be maintained - of which the original > > Smooth > > >>> Feather now stands out. > > >>> Anyways, if everyone's cool with that - then we can make a page > > in > > >>> Confluence and keep everything there - starting with moving > > Smooth > > >>> Feather there. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Tim > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert > > >>> HotWax Media > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594 > > >>> f:801.649.6595 > > >>> > > >>> ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I like the idea of moving deprecated themes to a web page. > > >>>> > > >>>> -Adrian > > >>>> > > >>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>> For several reason, I really appreciate sometimes to have the > > >>> good > > >>>> old > > >>>>> theme (Flat Grey) at hand. > > >>>>> We could keep Flat Grey and the best known at the moment > > >>> (obviously > > >>>>> BiznessTime at the moment). > > >>>>> The others would stay at http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yhQ > > >>>>> This would be an easy deprecation policy > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jacques > > >>>>> > > >>>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> > > >>>>>> There were differing opinions about them. I suggested having > > >>> only > > >>>> one > > >>>>>> theme in OFBiz, and the other themes could be provided > outside > > >>> the > > >>>>>> project - by theme providers. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> David thought it would be good to have several themes in the > > >>>> project > > >>>>>> in order to demonstrate the theme idea. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> From my perspective, having more than one theme in the > project > > >>>> means > > >>>>>> that much more code that has to be maintained. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> As far as I know, no "theme deprecation" plan has been > > >>> discussed. > > >>>>>> -Adrian > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Tim Ruppert wrote: > > >>>>>>> I may have missed this in general, but what is the plan to > > >>>> deprecate > > >>>>>>> themes when people aren't supporting them any longer? > We've > > >>>> already > > >>>>>>> got one that we want to do this to - and there will surely > be > > >>>> others > > >>>>>>> as we're trying to work out these backend interfaces. > > Anyways, > > >>> my > > >>>>>>> vote would be community votes and just removing them - but > > I'd > > >>>> love > > >>>>>>> to hear what the original intention was and other good > ideas > > >>> out > > >>>> there. > > >>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>> Tim > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert > > >>>>>>> HotWax Media > > >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 > > >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >> > > >
