I totally agree - let's update that table to have more information - including something about whether or not the author is supporting it.
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote: > Thinking more about that... > > The web page should include a way to contact the theme's author - > should > a user have questions about it. Looking into the future, if we have a > > number of people contributing themes, we could get swamped with theme > > bug reports, requests for new features, etc. It would be nice to > direct > that traffic to the author. > > -Adrian > > Adrian Crum wrote: > > At the same time, we don't want to offend the author. If the author > > > wants to remove it from the web page, then he/she is free to do so. > > > > -Adrian > > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> I think we should not bother to have it in the Visual Themes > gallery > >> and simply drop and forget it. BizznessTime replaced it and is > >> apparently the same. Thus we will not end up with an user not aware > > >> willing to use it as fundation. > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> > >>> Apparently I can commit there :) This has been removed and is > posted > >>> on the page. Thanks to everyone for helping out figure our > >>> deprecation path here. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Tim > >>> -- > >>> Tim Ruppert > >>> HotWax Media > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>> > >>> o:801.649.6594 > >>> f:801.649.6595 > >>> > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Smooth Feather has been posted to the Visual Themes page and can > now > >>>> be removed by anyone who has rights. I'm not sure where I ever > >>>> rememthemes is classified, but I'll give it a whirl and will > report > >>>> back. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Tim > >>>> -- > >>>> Tim Ruppert > >>>> HotWax Media > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > >>>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > >>>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Yeah, I can get behind that for sure. Btw, Jacques, I think > we > >>>> keep > >>>> > the Flat Grey forever - no reason to deprecate that one - just > the > >>>> > ones that aren't going to be maintained - of which the > original > >>>> Smooth > >>>> > Feather now stands out. > >>>> > > >>>> > Anyways, if everyone's cool with that - then we can make a page > in > >>>> > Confluence and keep everything there - starting with moving > Smooth > >>>> > Feather there. > >>>> > > >>>> > Cheers, > >>>> > Tim > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Tim Ruppert > >>>> > HotWax Media > >>>> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > > >>>> > o:801.649.6594 > >>>> > f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > > >>>> > ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > I like the idea of moving deprecated themes to a web page. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > -Adrian > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>> > > > For several reason, I really appreciate sometimes to have > the > >>>> > good > >>>> > > old > >>>> > > > theme (Flat Grey) at hand. > >>>> > > > We could keep Flat Grey and the best known at the moment > >>>> > (obviously > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > BiznessTime at the moment). > >>>> > > > The others would stay at http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yhQ > >>>> > > > This would be an easy deprecation policy > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > Jacques > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> > >>>> > > >> There were differing opinions about them. I suggested > having > >>>> > only > >>>> > > one > >>>> > > >> theme in OFBiz, and the other themes could be provided > outside > >>>> > the > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >> project - by theme providers. > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> David thought it would be good to have several themes in > the > >>>> > > project > >>>> > > >> in order to demonstrate the theme idea. > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> From my perspective, having more than one theme in the > project > >>>> > > means > >>>> > > >> that much more code that has to be maintained. > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> As far as I know, no "theme deprecation" plan has been > >>>> > discussed. > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> -Adrian > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> > > >>> I may have missed this in general, but what is the plan > to > >>>> > > deprecate > >>>> > > >>> themes when people aren't supporting them any longer? > We've > >>>> > > already > >>>> > > >>> got one that we want to do this to - and there will > surely be > >>>> > > others > >>>> > > >>> as we're trying to work out these backend interfaces. > >>>> Anyways, > >>>> > my > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>> vote would be community votes and just removing them - > but > >>>> I'd > >>>> > > love > >>>> > > >>> to hear what the original intention was and other good > ideas > >>>> > out > >>>> > > there. > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > > >>> Cheers, > >>>> > > >>> Tim > >>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert > >>>> > > >>> HotWax Media > >>>> > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>> > > >>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > > >>> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >
