I am aware that it will be dropped, and I welcome it. +1 as well for dropping it from the Confluence page. I would prefer if people did not remember my mistakes, or have an easy place to reference them :)

Ryan Foster
HotWax Media
801.671.0769
ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com




On May 7, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

Ryan clearly expressed that BizznesTIme is a replacement for SmoothFeather which should be dropped, or did I miss something ? Will Ryan be aware of it there ?

Jacques

From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
+1

Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote:

At the same time, we don't want to offend the author. If the author
wants to remove it from the web page, then he/she is free to do so.

-Adrian

Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> I think we should not bother to have it in the Visual Themes gallery
and
> simply drop and forget it. BizznessTime replaced it and is
apparently
> the same. Thus we will not end up with an user not aware willing to
use
> it as fundation.
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> Apparently I can commit there :) This has been removed and is
posted
>> on the page.  Thanks to everyone for helping out figure our
>> deprecation path here.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tim
>> -- >> Tim Ruppert
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>> o:801.649.6594
>> f:801.649.6595
>>
>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Smooth Feather has been posted to the Visual Themes page and can
now
>>> be removed by anyone who has rights.  I'm not sure where I ever
>>> rememthemes is classified, but I'll give it a whirl and will
report
>>> back.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tim
>>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert
>>> HotWax Media
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>
>>> o:801.649.6594
>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>
>>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yeah, I can get behind that for sure. Btw, Jacques, I think we
>>> keep
>>> > the Flat Grey forever - no reason to deprecate that one - just
the
>>> > ones that aren't going to be maintained - of which the original
>>> Smooth
>>> > Feather now stands out.
>>> >
>>> > Anyways, if everyone's cool with that - then we can make a page
in
>>> > Confluence and keep everything there - starting with moving
Smooth
>>> > Feather there.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Tim
>>> > --
>>> > Tim Ruppert
>>> > HotWax Media
>>> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>> >
>>> > o:801.649.6594
>>> > f:801.649.6595
>>> >
>>> > ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I like the idea of moving deprecated themes to a web page.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Adrian
>>> > >
>>> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> > > > For several reason, I really appreciate sometimes to have
the
>>> > good
>>> > > old
>>> > > > theme (Flat Grey) at hand.
>>> > > > We could keep Flat Grey and the best known at the moment
>>> > (obviously
>>> > >
>>> > > > BiznessTime at the moment).
>>> > > > The others would stay at http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yhQ
>>> > > > This would be an easy deprecation policy
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Jacques
>>> > > >
>>> > > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com>
>>> > > >> There were differing opinions about them. I suggested
having
>>> > only
>>> > > one
>>> > > >> theme in OFBiz, and the other themes could be provided
outside
>>> > the
>>> > >
>>> > > >> project - by theme providers.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> David thought it would be good to have several themes in
the
>>> > > project
>>> > > >> in order to demonstrate the theme idea.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> From my perspective, having more than one theme in the
project
>>> > > means
>>> > > >> that much more code that has to be maintained.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> As far as I know, no "theme deprecation" plan has been
>>> > discussed.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> -Adrian
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>> > > >>> I may have missed this in general, but what is the plan
to
>>> > > deprecate
>>> > > >>> themes when people aren't supporting them any longer?
We've
>>> > > already
>>> > > >>> got one that we want to do this to - and there will surely
be
>>> > > others
>>> > > >>> as we're trying to work out these backend interfaces.
>>> Anyways,
>>> > my
>>> > >
>>> > > >>> vote would be community votes and just removing them -
but
>>> I'd
>>> > > love
>>> > > >>> to hear what the original intention was and other good
ideas
>>> > out
>>> > > there.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Cheers,
>>> > > >>> Tim
>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert
>>> > > >>> HotWax Media
>>> > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594
>>> > > >>> f:801.649.6595
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>
>
>
>



Reply via email to