He's all good with dropping it completely - I was +1'ing Adrian's policy proposal. I don't mind having the not supported ones up there though. Let the number of themes grow. I just don't see any reason to flush it totally in general - but in this case, feel free to do whatever you like - foster will not be sad either way :)
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Ryan clearly expressed that BizznesTIme is a replacement for > SmoothFeather which should be dropped, or did I miss something ? Will > > Ryan be aware of it there ? > > Jacques > > From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> > > +1 > > > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -- > > Tim Ruppert > > HotWax Media > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > > o:801.649.6594 > > f:801.649.6595 > > > > ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote: > > > >> At the same time, we don't want to offend the author. If the > author > >> wants to remove it from the web page, then he/she is free to do > so. > >> > >> -Adrian > >> > >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> > I think we should not bother to have it in the Visual Themes > gallery > >> and > >> > simply drop and forget it. BizznessTime replaced it and is > >> apparently > >> > the same. Thus we will not end up with an user not aware willing > to > >> use > >> > it as fundation. > >> > > >> > Jacques > >> > > >> > From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> > >> >> Apparently I can commit there :) This has been removed and is > >> posted > >> >> on the page. Thanks to everyone for helping out figure our > >> >> deprecation path here. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Tim > >> >> -- > >> >> Tim Ruppert > >> >> HotWax Media > >> >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> >> > >> >> o:801.649.6594 > >> >> f:801.649.6595 > >> >> > >> >> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Smooth Feather has been posted to the Visual Themes page and > can > >> now > >> >>> be removed by anyone who has rights. I'm not sure where I > ever > >> >>> rememthemes is classified, but I'll give it a whirl and will > >> report > >> >>> back. > >> >>> > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> Tim > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Tim Ruppert > >> >>> HotWax Media > >> >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> >>> > >> >>> o:801.649.6594 > >> >>> f:801.649.6595 > >> >>> > >> >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > Yeah, I can get behind that for sure. Btw, Jacques, I think > we > >> >>> keep > >> >>> > the Flat Grey forever - no reason to deprecate that one - > just > >> the > >> >>> > ones that aren't going to be maintained - of which the > original > >> >>> Smooth > >> >>> > Feather now stands out. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Anyways, if everyone's cool with that - then we can make a > page > >> in > >> >>> > Confluence and keep everything there - starting with moving > >> Smooth > >> >>> > Feather there. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Cheers, > >> >>> > Tim > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > Tim Ruppert > >> >>> > HotWax Media > >> >>> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> >>> > > >> >>> > o:801.649.6594 > >> >>> > f:801.649.6595 > >> >>> > > >> >>> > ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I like the idea of moving deprecated themes to a web page. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > -Adrian > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> >>> > > > For several reason, I really appreciate sometimes to > have > >> the > >> >>> > good > >> >>> > > old > >> >>> > > > theme (Flat Grey) at hand. > >> >>> > > > We could keep Flat Grey and the best known at the moment > >> >>> > (obviously > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > BiznessTime at the moment). > >> >>> > > > The others would stay at http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yhQ > >> >>> > > > This would be an easy deprecation policy > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > Jacques > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> > >> >>> > > >> There were differing opinions about them. I suggested > >> having > >> >>> > only > >> >>> > > one > >> >>> > > >> theme in OFBiz, and the other themes could be provided > >> outside > >> >>> > the > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> project - by theme providers. > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> David thought it would be good to have several themes > in > >> the > >> >>> > > project > >> >>> > > >> in order to demonstrate the theme idea. > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> From my perspective, having more than one theme in the > >> project > >> >>> > > means > >> >>> > > >> that much more code that has to be maintained. > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> As far as I know, no "theme deprecation" plan has been > >> >>> > discussed. > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> -Adrian > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > >> Tim Ruppert wrote: > >> >>> > > >>> I may have missed this in general, but what is the > plan > >> to > >> >>> > > deprecate > >> >>> > > >>> themes when people aren't supporting them any longer? > >> We've > >> >>> > > already > >> >>> > > >>> got one that we want to do this to - and there will > surely > >> be > >> >>> > > others > >> >>> > > >>> as we're trying to work out these backend interfaces. > >> >>> Anyways, > >> >>> > my > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> vote would be community votes and just removing them - > >> but > >> >>> I'd > >> >>> > > love > >> >>> > > >>> to hear what the original intention was and other good > >> ideas > >> >>> > out > >> >>> > > there. > >> >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > > >>> Cheers, > >> >>> > > >>> Tim > >> >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert > >> >>> > > >>> HotWax Media > >> >>> > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594 > >> >>> > > >>> f:801.649.6595 > >> >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
