I'll take care of it real quick.

Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

----- "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> +1, good idea!
> 
> Jacques
> 
> From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> >I totally agree - let's update that table to have more information -
> including something about whether or not the author is 
> >supporting it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tim
> > --
> > Tim Ruppert
> > HotWax Media
> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >
> > o:801.649.6594
> > f:801.649.6595
> >
> > ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thinking more about that...
> >>
> >> The web page should include a way to contact the theme's author -
> >> should
> >> a user have questions about it. Looking into the future, if we have
> a
> >>
> >> number of people contributing themes, we could get swamped with
> theme
> >>
> >> bug reports, requests for new features, etc. It would be nice to
> >> direct
> >> that traffic to the author.
> >>
> >> -Adrian
> >>
> >> Adrian Crum wrote:
> >> > At the same time, we don't want to offend the author. If the
> author
> >>
> >> > wants to remove it from the web page, then he/she is free to do
> so.
> >> >
> >> > -Adrian
> >> >
> >> > Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >> >> I think we should not bother to have it in the Visual Themes
> >> gallery
> >> >> and simply drop and forget it. BizznessTime replaced it and is
> >> >> apparently the same. Thus we will not end up with an user not
> aware
> >>
> >> >> willing to use it as fundation.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jacques
> >> >>
> >> >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> >> >>> Apparently I can commit there :) This has been removed and is
> >> posted
> >> >>> on the page.  Thanks to everyone for helping out figure our
> >> >>> deprecation path here.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> Tim
> >> >>> -- 
> >> >>> Tim Ruppert
> >> >>> HotWax Media
> >> >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >> >>>
> >> >>> o:801.649.6594
> >> >>> f:801.649.6595
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Smooth Feather has been posted to the Visual Themes page and
> can
> >> now
> >> >>>> be removed by anyone who has rights.  I'm not sure where I
> ever
> >> >>>> rememthemes is classified, but I'll give it a whirl and will
> >> report
> >> >>>> back.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>> Tim
> >> >>>> -- 
> >> >>>> Tim Ruppert
> >> >>>> HotWax Media
> >> >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> o:801.649.6594
> >> >>>> f:801.649.6595
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> > Yeah, I can get behind that for sure.  Btw, Jacques, I
> think
> >> we
> >> >>>> keep
> >> >>>> > the Flat Grey forever - no reason to deprecate that one -
> just
> >> the
> >> >>>> > ones that aren't going to be maintained - of which the
> >> original
> >> >>>> Smooth
> >> >>>> > Feather now stands out.
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > Anyways, if everyone's cool with that - then we can make a
> page
> >> in
> >> >>>> > Confluence and keep everything there - starting with moving
> >> Smooth
> >> >>>> > Feather there.
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > Cheers,
> >> >>>> > Tim
> >> >>>> > --
> >> >>>> > Tim Ruppert
> >> >>>> > HotWax Media
> >> >>>> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > o:801.649.6594
> >> >>>> > f:801.649.6595
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > ----- "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > > I like the idea of moving deprecated themes to a web
> page.
> >> >>>> > >
> >> >>>> > > -Adrian
> >> >>>> > >
> >> >>>> > > Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >> >>>> > > > For several reason, I really appreciate sometimes to
> have
> >> the
> >> >>>> > good
> >> >>>> > > old
> >> >>>> > > > theme (Flat Grey) at hand.
> >> >>>> > > > We could keep Flat Grey and the best known at the
> moment
> >> >>>> > (obviously
> >> >>>> > >
> >> >>>> > > > BiznessTime at the moment).
> >> >>>> > > > The others would stay at http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yhQ
> >> >>>> > > > This would be an easy deprecation policy
> >> >>>> > > >
> >> >>>> > > > Jacques
> >> >>>> > > >
> >> >>>> > > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com>
> >> >>>> > > >> There were differing opinions about them. I suggested
> >> having
> >> >>>> > only
> >> >>>> > > one
> >> >>>> > > >> theme in OFBiz, and the other themes could be provided
> >> outside
> >> >>>> > the
> >> >>>> > >
> >> >>>> > > >> project - by theme providers.
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >> David thought it would be good to have several themes
> in
> >> the
> >> >>>> > > project
> >> >>>> > > >> in order to demonstrate the theme idea.
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >> From my perspective, having more than one theme in the
> >> project
> >> >>>> > > means
> >> >>>> > > >> that much more code that has to be maintained.
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >> As far as I know, no "theme deprecation" plan has been
> >> >>>> > discussed.
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >> -Adrian
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >> Tim Ruppert wrote:
> >> >>>> > > >>> I may have missed this in general, but what is the
> plan
> >> to
> >> >>>> > > deprecate
> >> >>>> > > >>> themes when people aren't supporting them any longer?
> >> We've
> >> >>>> > > already
> >> >>>> > > >>> got one that we want to do this to - and there will
> >> surely be
> >> >>>> > > others
> >> >>>> > > >>> as we're trying to work out these backend interfaces.
> >> >>>> Anyways,
> >> >>>> > my
> >> >>>> > >
> >> >>>> > > >>> vote would be community votes and just removing them
> -
> >> but
> >> >>>> I'd
> >> >>>> > > love
> >> >>>> > > >>> to hear what the original intention was and other
> good
> >> ideas
> >> >>>> > out
> >> >>>> > > there.
> >> >>>> > > >>>
> >> >>>> > > >>> Cheers,
> >> >>>> > > >>> Tim
> >> >>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert
> >> >>>> > > >>> HotWax Media
> >> >>>> > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >> >>>> > > >>>
> >> >>>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594
> >> >>>> > > >>> f:801.649.6595
> >> >>>> > > >>>
> >> >>>> > > >>
> >> >>>> > > >
> >> >>>> > > >
> >> >>>> > > >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >

Reply via email to