Hell, you need more memory for the one demo :) - we might want to try getting a second one. As far as the scripts for setting up and running each of these instances - they will vary vastly by hardware setup - and I don't think that I can provide those because those are all the intellectual property of Contegix - not mine to give out. I'll send along an email looping you in on that discussion though Hans, so we'll know.
Cheers, Ruppert -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Dec 23, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > Ok, I requested more memory from infra. > > if you could provide me with the scripts to rebuild the instances every > night, i will have a look at that.... > > Regards, > Hans > > On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 23:46 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: >> This is great Hans - thanks so much for doing this. What I would recommend >> is spinning up at least one more demo if we wanted to limit it - for the >> current release branch - especially since we'd like for people to be able to >> see the differences. I wish that we could up the amount of memory, but >> that's ok :) I guess now we're seeing some of the issues with moving over - >> but such is life. >> >> Cheers, >> Ruppert >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:31 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >> >>> I updated and restarted the ofbiz system on the apache infra. >>> There is however only 500M so can only run one version. >>> you can try: http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/ >>> https needs to be setup, can do that too this week . >>> Do we really need all versions as a demo? >>> >>> i can spend time keeping these installations going. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hans >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 21:41 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>> Alright, just wanted to raise this up again to anyone working with the >>>> infra team at the ASF - I'm still not sure that we have a working >>>> duplicate of what Contegix and HotWax have been hosting for years. Here's >>>> the checklist if anyone's interested: >>>> >>>> 1. docs.ofbiz.org - migrated, but still dependent at some level of the old >>>> backup at olddocs.ofbiz.org >>>> 2. demo.ofbiz.org - not migrated >>>> 3. demo40.ofbiz.org - not migrated >>>> 4. demo904.ofbiz.org - not migrated >>>> 5. api.ofbiz.org - migrated? >>>> 6. build.ofbiz.org (I think this is close) >>>> 7. log.ofbiz.org - not migrated until 2, 3, and 4 are migrated >>>> 8. olddocs.ofbiz.org - not migrated >>>> 9. bigfiles.ofbiz.org - not migrated >>>> 10. anything else? >>>> >>>> We're now over the XMas holiday here and there are only 9 days left on >>>> this server. Please speak up on which portions are going to be a huge >>>> problem or please step up and help to migrate this stuff off because I >>>> don't want OFBiz to turn into a pumpkin because we didn't have people >>>> acting - we've been talking about it for six weeks now .... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Ruppert >>>> -- >>>> Tim Ruppert >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>> >>>> On Dec 15, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>> >>>>> The other thing to remember is that I don't think that the >>>>> demo.ofbiz.org, demo40.ofbiz.org, and demo904.ofbiz.org - but I think the >>>>> rest of those are good to go. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Ruppert >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>> HotWax Media >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>> >>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 PM, David E Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> What are the remaining resources? From memory: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - build.ofbiz.org >>>>>>>> - api.ofbiz.org >>>>>>>> - bigfiles.ofbiz.org >>>>>>>> - olddocs.ofbiz.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What were bigfiles.ofbiz.org? >>>>>> >>>>>> These are movie files and other big files linked to from docs.ofbiz.org, >>>>>> now cwiki.ofbiz.org (like the Framework Introduction videos). >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You're right that there hasn't been much about these... does anyone >>>>>>>> care? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> About olddocs... IMO it's a bad idea to move it over just because some >>>>>>>> old links inside the wiki itself can be served by it. Over >>>>>>>> time that content will get more and more stale, and more an more >>>>>>>> confusing. Let's just update the links as we notice them or as >>>>>>>> they bother us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, but for old tinylinks it's not always obvious to know what they >>>>>>> represent. There are some of them in OFBiz trunk as well (not >>>>>>> much 50+). And it's not very good for newcomers. If we could change >>>>>>> them in one shoot it would be great but we have to know where they >>>>>>> point to. >>>>>>> Also I must admit I have no time to put in this at the moment >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, hopefully we've learned our lesson... >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Looking for thoughts from the community since we're less than two >>>>>>>>> weeks away from removing this server. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also, what about moving the olddocs.ofbiz.org to ASF infra somewhere >>>>>>>>>> so that all of the links don't have to be updated? >>>>>>>>>> Something to think on .... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Ruppert >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> David you own this officially at this point - but I'd like to know >>>>>>>>>>> what we should do with this at the end of the month? The >>>>>>>>>>> reason is that there are a ton of subdomains, that even if we move >>>>>>>>>>> over to all being under ofbiz.apache.org or some other >>>>>>>>>>> hosted infra at apache, we will need to support the rewrites, etc >>>>>>>>>>> going forward. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd love to have everyone weigh in to see what we want to do. >>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Ruppert >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates >>> >> > -- > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
