I was reading this article and suddenly thought: why not giving access to branches in OFBiz project to people who need more than a patch to submit in a Jira (clearly Tom and I would have loved that)? http://prng.blogspot.fr/2009/02/commit-access-its-social-problem.html
Opinions? Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > Yes thanks! > > Jacques > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> >> >> On Dec 16, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> I even wonder if Jacopo did not make a more recent (and flexible) >>> proposition with which I totaly agreed (during fall, it seems to me but, I >>> can't find it), Jacopo? >> >> Do you mean the following? >> >> ======================== >> BTW, some time ago I also proposed an alternative path: see email with >> subject "[PROPOSAL] from specialpurpose to extras": to that I can add that >> we could provide two set of ant scripts, one similar to the one we have that >> builds/tests everything (framework+applications+specialpurpose) and one (the >> default) that only builds/tests the framework+applications; the release >> branches may only contain the framework+applications and separate releases >> of specialpurpose applications could be voted/released at different time. >> This approach may reach two goals: >> 1) slim down the "main" code that the community is more focused to >> improve/maintain/release >> 2) keep under the OFBiz community the ownership of all the other >> specialpurpose components; if one of them will get more attention and >> interest and could grow in quality or it is generic enough we could decide >> to move it to the release branch (maybe move it to applications) >> ======================== >> >> Jacopo >> >> >
