One of the solutions is to create brach on github, 
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz. A feature can be developed on Github and then 
a final patch can be submitted to Ofbiz Jira.

Regards
Anil Patel



On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> I was reading this article and suddenly thought: why not giving access to 
> branches in OFBiz project to people who need more than a patch to submit in a 
> Jira (clearly Tom and I would have loved that)?
> http://prng.blogspot.fr/2009/02/commit-access-its-social-problem.html
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Jacques
> 
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
>> Yes thanks!
>> 
>> Jacques
>> 
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> On Dec 16, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I even wonder if Jacopo did not make a more recent (and flexible) 
>>>> proposition with which I totaly agreed (during fall, it seems to me but, I 
>>>> can't find it), Jacopo?
>>> 
>>> Do you mean the following?
>>> 
>>> ========================
>>> BTW, some time ago I also proposed an alternative path: see email with 
>>> subject "[PROPOSAL] from specialpurpose to extras": to that I can add that 
>>> we could provide two set of ant scripts, one similar to the one we have 
>>> that builds/tests everything (framework+applications+specialpurpose) and 
>>> one (the default) that only builds/tests the framework+applications; the 
>>> release branches may only contain the framework+applications and separate 
>>> releases of specialpurpose applications could be voted/released at 
>>> different time. This approach may reach two goals:
>>> 1) slim down the "main" code that the community is more focused to 
>>> improve/maintain/release
>>> 2) keep under the OFBiz community the ownership of all the other 
>>> specialpurpose components; if one of them will get more attention and 
>>> interest and could grow in quality or it is generic enough we could decide 
>>> to move it to the release branch (maybe move it to applications)
>>> ========================
>>> 
>>> Jacopo
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to