From: "Nicolas Malin" <malin.nico...@librenberry.net>
> Le 15/11/2012 08:49, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> I don't see much activity recently
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ/fixforversion/12320551
>>
>> Should we not focus a bit more on it?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
> Hi all,
> 
> To continue on slim-down effort, I propose to work on a POC.
> We define the expected to manage component on extra.
> We select a component or subject to move from OFBiz to extra and a 
> delivery date.

I think we should also refer to "[PROPOSAL] from specialpurpose to extras" 
thread here.
I even wonder if Jacopo did not make a more recent (and flexible) proposition 
with which I totaly agreed (during fall, it seems to me but, I can't find it), 
Jacopo?
Maybe before going on this we would create an evolving wiki page to state the 
current situation, ideas, consensus and future.
I personnaly begin to lose the focus, a sole place to look at would be easier. 
There are a lot of good ideas, we need to pick the better (by consensus of 
course ;o)
 
> Each contributor wishing to work on it, would propose a solution to move 
> and use a component on extra, open an issue containing the process, 
> management and the example with selected component.
> 
> After the delivery date, we check avantage/disavantage of each 
> proposition and vote to choose the favorite solution.
> Write a best pratice to move/create a component on extra usable by OFBiz.
> 
> Then we can start with this process
>  * proposal/vote
>  * open jira issue
>  * write information on extras.html
>  * run move

It sounds like this could be in the page I proposed to create.
Before going further I believe we need to clarify in all minds, get consensus 
and then work on them

My 2cts

Jacques
 
> The aim isn't to define what to do but how to contribute when the goal 
> will be fixed.
> 
> Your opinions ?
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> -- 
> Nicolas MALIN
> Consultant
> Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
> Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
> -------
> Société LibrenBerry
> Tél : 02.48.02.56.12
> Site : http://www.librenberry.net/
>

Reply via email to