On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:57:43 +0100 Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
> O.Felka wrote: > > Am 15.01.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >> Procedural note: I didn't add it to my initial mail in order to keep it > >> short, but it is highly recommended that -1 votes be accompanied by a > >> brief motivation (1-2 lines), especially if you haven't participated in > >> the discussions so far. Knowing what is wrong can help a lot. This holds > >> for the -1 votes that have already been expressed too. > > > > If this should be a vote no one has to argue for his decision. > > Ultimately the +1, 0 or -1 is what counts, indeed. > > But in the case of a -1, an explanation is always helpful to understand > what's wrong (wrong timing, and why? wrong person, and why? do you see > an option we didn't consider, and which one?). So it is very common > practice, unless it's clear from the previous discussion, to provide it. > And I would personally find it very useful. > > Regards, > Andrea. And it is only a polite request for further information, not compulsory. -- Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
