On 04/04/2016 08:00 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, schrieb Απόστολος Συρόπουλος:
>>>
>>> yes, that's nice. But you shouldn't commit fixes without
>>> a possibility
>>> to test if it was good. Would you? ;-)
>>>
>>
>> First I did this in the past. Please see
>>
>> https://asyropoulos.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/compiling-openoffice4/
>>
>
> interesting. Thanks for the link.
>
>> At that time I was sure the patches would find their way
>> to source tree,
>> but apparently they have been ignored...
>>
>>> Nobody has said we don't do it and they are not more
>>> open-minded.
>>
>> I said that they are more open-minded! And I based this on
>> my own
>> personal experience. Not to mention that since you got the
>> code
>> from a company that produces Solaris, out of courtesy you
>> should
>> ensure the suite compiles under Solaris...
>
> We made the opposite experience. So, sorry that I've a
> different opinion.
>
>>> It's simply a fact that we have no experts for Solaris
>>> and no testing
>>> hardware.
>>
>> Hardware? We are not talking about SPARC machines. Nobody
>
> I didn't know that it's not about SPARC. This changes indeed
> the problem a bit. ;-)
>
> More in my answer to Patricia's mail.
>
> Marcus
In any case, since we don't currently have "official"
distros for Solaris -- I would be content changing all these
issues to ENHANCEMENT rather than DEFECT.
Thoughts?
--
--------------------------------------------
MzK
"Time spent with cats is never wasted."
-- Sigmund Freud
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
