OK, I will hold on until this (hopefully not endless) discussion is finished... ;-)
Matthias Am 26.05.20 um 20:30 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Rory > > >>> I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced >>> it with >>> >>> "the software reads all current file types of major competitors." >>> >>> Regards, >>> Pedro >> My reasoning for the earlier wording which I suggested is that many users, >> becoming more and more inexperienced, expect every file to open with >> OpenOffice; they take it as a personal insult when a file does not open, for >> whatever reason. I prefer the slight ambiguity of "most". > That is why I suggest "file types". I understand that users expect OpenOffice > to open every file. But I also expect my "old" Office 2016 to open every > Microsoft OOXML file correctly and it does not... > Should we give up on educating users because they feel insulted? Should we > not insist on Open Document because most users want to keep using Microsoft > file formats? > > Regards, > Pedro > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
